The (Real) Real Americans - Instablogs
The (Real) Real Americans
Laura Schleifer , New York: Nov 4 2008
Made Popular Nov 5 2008
United States :

The (Real) Real Americans

As of late, much has been made of the so-called “Real American”. The “Real American”, we are told, watches NASCAR, drinks beer, has barbecues, fears God, works in a “real” occupation like plumbing, and has a very real suspicion of and hostility toward all things intellectual, effete, European, coastal, and most of all, God forbid, liberal. The “Real American” has been so canonized, so lionized, that s/he has almost become a mythological figment of national imagination.

But to some in this country, the term “Real American” conjures up a very different image, one equally if not more mythical and epic...one of people who, while often living in the same regions of the country as those other real Americans, have in many ways traits that might seem almost foreign. They have their own languages, their own religious and cultural traditions, often even their own laws and governments.

Oh, and one other thing–these “real” real Americans aren’t white. (Which, no matter how you look at it, is what those other “Real Americans” are implied to be). Like Sen. Obama himself, they’re members of a racial ‘minority’ group, one who’s been discriminated against as severely as any other in this country.

I am speaking, of course, of the Native American Indians. And it is this marginalized group of Americans who could prove to tilt this election in certain swing states later today. Obama has made a concerted effort to reach out to tribal nations, hiring full-time paid vote coordinators in the Dakotas and Montana, opening six reservation field offices in those same states, and meeting privately with tribal leaders to discuss their concerns, as well as holding a rally at the Montana Crow reservation. McCain, by contrast, not only has not made such efforts, he even ignored an invitation to meet with tribal leaders in South Dakota when he was there, opting instead to focus all his attention on a speaking engagement at a motorcycle party.

Apparently, the efforts of Sen. Obama are paying off. The Native American Times, by far and away the most influential press in the community, has officially endorsed Barack Obama, saying that, “We have been waiting a long time for someone like Barack to come along. He inspires us to want and to dream of more”. First-time voters from remote rural reservations have been coming out to register for their first federal government election. From co-sponsoring the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to gaining the support of the Native American Caucus of the Democratic Committee and the Winnebago tribe of Nebraska, he has made more inroads within this community than perhaps any other presidential candidate.

It isn’t just McCain or the Republicans who’ve ignored this sect of the population. Even other Democrats have overlooked them most severely. Only true progressives on the left wing of the party such as Dennis Kucinich, Bill Richardson and Mike Gravel have paid any attention to the Native community at all. With reservations plagued by joblessness, meth-amphetamine and alcohol addiction, and some of the worst grinding poverty in the U.S. (Pine Ridge reservation in South Dakota is officially the poorest area in the U.S., with living conditions as poverty-stricken as those in any developing world country), Native issues need to be at the top of the national agenda, but due to the small size of the population they are largely ignored year after year.

This year, Barack Obama has not made that same mistake. What’s surprising, however, is that John McCain has. It’s yet one more way in which the better aspects of this senator’s record have been sold on a dime in the mad race for presidency, only to backfire on him in the end. Long before McCain ever ran for president, he worked with Bill Richardson to ensure that the Defense Dept. return 89,000 acres of land to the Ute Tribe. He is also the only Republican to sit on the Committee of Indian affairs. For these reasons, he still has many supporters in the Native community, and some friction has been building on this issue between newbie Obama supporters and old guard McCain supporters. “Native American National Healthcare/Education/Poverty Rate–A Sick Joke!” shrieks the Native Americans Against Obama website ( www.nativeamericansagainstobama.com ), which urges that a vote for Obama is a vote for no real change.

On the other hand, dig a little deeper into Sen. McCain’s background on this issue and you’ll find that, like many things about his ‘maverick’ reputation, it doesn’t all quite add up. Ever the champion of Big Business above and beyond all else, in 1996 McCain sponsored the bill in his home state of Alaska, which passed the Senate but never made it to the House. This bill, which many referred to as a bid for “An American West Bank”, called for a forced removal of Navahos from their lands as a way of freeing up the Black Mesa for mining by the Peabody Coal Corp. , a continuation of a prior bill McCain was also involved with sponsoring which did, in fact, result in the forced removal of Navahos from Arizona to Nevada. ( www.nativeamericanroots.net ). This situation was so dire, in fact, that it prompted a UN Human Rights Investigation.

And so, in the end, it comes back Obama, the wild card who promises a chance to “want more, to dream more”, and whether Native people are willing to trust him as more than just another politician who’ll promise them a dream and then shove them into a nightmare. And it also comes down to whether the media and the general public will care enough about the issues of Native people to continue to make them newsworthy after the election passes, no matter who ends up in office, as to whether these issues get the attention they deserve.

One way of finding out how much the rest of America is paying attention to Native America is by visiting the website perspctv.com, which tracks how much publicity a person or an issue is getting through a unique method of tracking the number of times it’s mentioned in the news media and in the blogosphere. In this election season the site’s been focusing on the buzz generated by the candidates, but after tomorrow it will expand to include individual issues, something that is especially useful when seeking to understand how much attention some of the lesser discussed issues, like Native American concerns, are getting.

As for the election later today, we will see who most of the “real” real Americans decide to vote for. But one thing is fairly certain–unlike those other “real” Americans, this group can’t be distracted with smoke-and-mirror culture war tactics.

Then again, it looks like many of the other type of “real American” won’t be so easily misled this year, either. Perhaps this time around, the term Real American can take on a new meaning altogether.

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
1 Stars
Laura Schleifer
New York, United States
Talk about a typo...McCain’s homestate, and of course also the state where the bill attempting the forced relocation of Navahos for the purposed of mining was introduced, was Arizona–not Alaska. Oh, the dangers of posting articles late at night without thoroughly proofreading them beforehand!
1 Stars
Michael C
Lyon, France
Yeah, I know what you mean!!

Writing the article is the cool bit and I get stuck into my subject and bang away at the keyboard like a madman in order to get my ideas down as quickly as possible.

Then, because I’m in a hurry to put my latest offering up to be read by others, I check over it for spelling errors, inconsistencies etc very (and surely too) quickly!!

The result is that I’ve never, and I mean (NEVER) posted without having to go back and edit it later.

Oh, and did you know that you can edit an article AFTER you put it online? Ask me how if you don’t.

(I say this because this is your first article, which probably means you are possibly still ”learning the ropes).

Moreover, ask me about ANY problems to do with getting around the site. I’m going to ”friend” you. If you accept, you can email me on the site..

Seeya!!
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Michael C
Lyon, France
Thanks for your very informative and thought-provoking article. There’s just one thing that I would like you to help me out with though, if you would.

What is ”Real American”?

What is ”Native American Indian”?

My questions are honest and sincere.

And that’s because there’s another question.

”Indians”, as far as I am aware, emigrated to what we now call ”America” a very long time ago.

They came from other shores, they do not originate from that continent, so why are they

”Native”

and why are the others

”American”?

Just because the ”Natives” ”got there” ”first”?

None of those now born and living on the north American continent have their ancient ancestral roots there.

Please forgive me if I’m wrong, but I have the impression that this is more about peurile territorial rights than who is ”American” or not.

(This doesn’t mean of course, Laura, that I am not aware of, and horrified by, the abuse of, and lack of consideration for, Indian culture in the ”United States” of today.).

But let’s not mix things up too much.

I would be genuinly interested to know your opinion on this....

Thank you for reading me.....
1 Stars
Laura Schleifer
New York, United States
Hi, Michael-
Thanks for reading and for your thoughtful comments.

Yes, I hear where you’re coming from, which is why I ended the piece on the note of, let’s stop all this nonsense about who’s a ”real American” and who isn’t based on where they live or whether they like NASCAR and barbecues, and start defining it by something else. (i.e. a genuine investment in the welfare of this country and caring about the people in it–all of them).

By bringing up the idea of the Native Americans (I called them Native American Indians because I know some people prefer to be called Native Americans, and others American Indians) as the ”Real real Americans”, I merely meant to draw attention to the fact that in all this pre-election hype about so-called ”real Americans”, it’s ironic that the ones who’ve been here the longest are one of the most ignored of all demographics. At the end of the day, yes, this is a nation of immigrants, and we are all ”real Americans”. In fact, if you really want to stretch it back to ancient times, modern scientific theory claims that we are a world of immigrants, with only Africans in Africa living in their ancestor’s first place of origin.

But to me personally, there is a special sting in the fact that those who lived here first, and whose roots here stretch the deepest, are treated so abominably, while politicians and media pundits prattle on about ”Real Americans” as if ”Real Americans” are all rural, Christian, and white. And that is a strange paradox, one I haven’t seen yet addressed in the media, which is what led me to write the article.

I hope this clears things up for you. Thank you again for your interest and your thoughts.
1 Stars
Hassan Rizvi
Lahore, Pakistan
Hey Laura,
I see this is your first article at insta at least;Let me tell you ,you must write more.You have a way of writing which keeps the reader engaged.

I enjoyed the blog - and am awaiting the result of the elections betting Obama would win - yet not too sure if he can bring real change.
1 Stars
Laura Schleifer
New York, United States
Thanks, Hassan! I definitely plan on contributing more articles. If you’re interested to read more, here’s another article I wrote on one of the lesser known aspects of President-elect Obama’s record: http://nyartivist.newsvine.com/_news/2008/11/03/2069555-if-animals-could-vote-would-they-vote-for-obama

I can understand your hesitation over whether Obama will bring real change. After reading ”Dreams from My Father”, a book he wrote long before he was planning to run for office, I was deeply impressed by his obvious commitment to social justice. But he is working within a corrupt system, and many of the choices he has had to make in order to rise in that system–his vote in favor of the wall on the border of Mexico, for example, or his recent appointment of warhawk Rahm Emanuel as Chief of Staff–seems to indicate it will be business as usual for the U.S. and its war machine and policies of aggression. At any rate, though, just the fact that an Obama govt. is receptive to open communication, and is actively inviting peace talks, is an indication of a genuine move towards change. Let’s just pray that that initiative, and the others that are positive, grow over the course of his presidency as Obama himself grows in his confidence to push along the agenda that he himself would naturally want.
Add your Comment